in

Court awards Duchess of Cambridge damages over topless photos

French court rules Kates privacy was breached in case over paparazzi shots published in celebrity magazine

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have welcomed a French court verdict that paparazzi photos of Kate topless on holiday were an invasion of the royal couples privacy.

Twenty-four hours after the announcement that Kate and Prince William were expecting their third child, the court in Nanterre, west of Paris, awarded them 100,000 (91,000) in damages and interest to be paid by the celebrity magazine Closer and two photographers.

The magazines editor and the CEO of its publisher were each fined a further 45,000 the maximum allowed. The awards, while high for a French court, are considerably lower than the 1.5m the couples legal team had demanded.

After the verdict, royal aides said the couple had suffered an unjustified intrusion and were pleased the judge had found in their favour.

The incident was a serious breach of privacy, and their royal highnesses felt it essential to pursue all legal remedies, a statement read.

A lawyer for Closer, Paul-Albert Iweins, said the damages award was in line with previous payouts but that the fines were exaggerated considering it was a simple case of privacy.

Six people, including three photographers, were tried this year after long-lens pictures of the couple on holiday in France were published in the French celebrity magazine and a local newspaper, La Provence.

The photographs were taken in the summer of 2012 and show the royal couple on a terrace by a swimming pool at a private chateau owned by Viscount Linley, the Queens nephew, in the Luberon, Provence.

Splashed across the cover of Closer under the headline: Oh My God [in English]: the photos that will go around the world, the photos show the duchess wearing only the bottom half of her bikini. There were more topless photographs on the inside pages.

A week before the Closer pictures were published, La Provence carried a photograph of Kate in the same property wearing a swimsuit.

The photographs were reportedly offered to British publications, which turned them down.

After Closer hit the newsstands, the couple were granted an immediate injunction preventing the photos being used elsewhere, but they still appeared in several European publications.

Their lawyers asked that Closer be ordered to pay 1.5m in damages and compensation for the shock of seeing the paparazzi photographs printed, and a further 50,000 from La Provence.

In a letter to the court read at a hearing in May William wrote that the case was particularly shocking because it reminded us of the harassment that led to the death of my mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.

Diana was killed in a car accident in August 1997 while being chased through a Paris underpass by photographers. Her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed, and the cars driver, Henri Paul, who had been drinking, were also killed.

In his declaration, the duke said: In September 2012, my wife and I thought that we could go to France for a few days in a secluded villa owned by a member of my family, and thus enjoy our privacy. We know France and the French and we know that they are, in principle, respectful of private life, including that of their guests. The clandestine way in which these photographs were taken was particularly shocking to us as it breached our privacy.

St Jamess Palace issued a statement at the time describing the incident as being reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales.

The public prosecutor had also asked for very significant fines for Closers editor, Laurence Pieau, Ernesto Mauri the CEO of publisher Mondadori and two Paris picture agency photographers, Cyril Moreau and Dominique Jacovides, suspected of having taken the shots. The pair, along with Valerie Suau from La Provence, faced charges of invading or being complicit to an invasion of William and Kates privacy.

Moreau and Jacovides, who denied the charges, were each fined 10,000, of which half was suspended. Suau was given a 1,000 suspended fine and the newspaper director at the time the pictures were published, Marc Auburtin, was given a 1,500 suspended fine. Auburtin and Suau were jointly ordered to pay 3,000 damages to the couple.

Suau admitted taking photographs of the royal couple at the Linley property, but said she did not consider them to be a breach of privacy.

French courts do not usually make large awards in such cases. The former president Franois Hollandes partner, Julie Gayet, was awarded 15,000 after Closer published pictures of them, and Florian Philippot, a vice-president of the far-right Front National, received a 20,000 award for the publication of photos of him with another man, said to be his partner.

During the May hearing, Iweins attacked the Anglo-Saxon reasoning behind punitive damages and compensation and said the trial was hypocritical.

The public and private lives of the royal couple are so closely linked as to be inseparable, Iweins said, adding that the photographs cast the young couple in a positive light.

Its of public interest to know that future heirs to the throne have a solid relationship and are getting on well. Its all part of the royal business, he said.

Closer is owned by the Italian-based Mondadori Group, one of the biggest publishing companies in Europe, which owns several high-profile glossy magazines including Grazia.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/sep/05/topless-photos-of-duchess-of-cambridge-were-invasion-of-privacy

How To Order At Sweetgreen Like A Betch

A tale of two Irmas: rich Miami ready for tumult as poor Miami waits and hopes